Metaphysics: What Are “Aspects” and How do They Work?

The following is an adaptation of material that was written for a client, as part of a online time slot to explain and answer questions about the concept of spiritual/metaphysical aspects. These questions arose as they were reading my book, where the concept is mentioned in one of the readings. The result was a fairly comprehensive explanation which I decided to use to create the main article on this website about the concept (i.e. “main” as in referenced by the glossary). Some portions of the original questions and material were edited to serve the purposes of this publication.

What are Spiritual/Metaphysical “Aspects”?

All Abstract Consciousness, which is All There Is, is or can be subdivided into portions of Itself, to which we call a href=”https://www.heartki.com/spiritual-glossary/#Aspect”>aspects.

This applies to all Consciousness, whenever Consciousness might be. Which includes you as a human being.

To illustrate, think of countries in the same continent, cities in the same country, or districts/boroughs/suburbs in the same city, for example. If you establish a parallel between each one of the larger items, and a portion of Consciousness (or a “spiritual entity” if you will), each of the smaller parts or subdivisions would be aspects to that portion, or entity.

Aspects are one with broader Consciousness they’re part of, and always will be; they’re just a way, in this Universe and that I know of, that Consciousness has of expressing itself.

Further, this “feature” has to do with a property of All abstract Consciousness in this Universe and the rules/laws that apply herein: Consciousness is perpetually “looping” into itself in perpetuity giving rise to and creating new versions of itself as well as displaying or revealing elements, parts, or subdivisions of itself, again called aspects. This process is akin to an infinite fractal expansion — one of the ways by which Consciousness is said to be Infinite — which can as be visually illustrated by videos such as: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ouG6L-2L3Q (Youtube video).

My best way to convey how aspects “work” is by using an analogy with something that happens in the human reality.

When you’re on your own with your parents and in their presence, this might tend to bring out of version of you: the son/child “you”. When you’re in a work environment, with your boss, co-workers, etc. you’ll tend to be the worker or professional version of you, which while the same person, is a slightly different side compared to the son/child one.

The same might apply when you’re in a romantic setting with your girlfriend/partner/spouse/wife, which will tend to bring out the partner version of you. The same when you’re in a learning context with teachers, bringing out the student self; when you’re with your children, bringing out the parent/progenitor self; or in a social setting with friends, bringing out the social self. And so on.

Your mileage may vary. These are all different and somewhat interchangeable versions of “you”, and they’ll have a degree of overlap between them. You can have multiple sides be present in a given scenario, like in a family setting where your parents, spouse, and children are all present; or in a professional context also also ticks social boxes, for example.

But at the same time, if you notice, each of those versions is also subtly distinct from one another.

Distinct enough that and even if you tried, you’d probably find it strange or difficult to try to bring out a version that doesn’t quite match the setting. Such as trying to embody your work side in a family setting, the social side when you’re with your children, or the student self with your partner, to name a few examples.

This is how, through these different sides of yourself having enough of a difference to almost have an “essence” of their own, that you may notice these subtle nuances at play, ultimately of a spiritual and metaphysical nature, even as a human being carrying out a human life.

Having slightly different facets to you like this is normal, and doesn’t on its own mean you’re being dishonest or untruthful in any way.

The external setting surrounding you at any given time will naturally call for these slightly different sides, or “aspects” of you. Each set of external circumstances, as well as those who are around you in your presence, will tend to bring out a slightly different versions of yourself, depending on what those circumstances “ask for” — in other words, what the external reality resonates with you within.

Being false or fake is a different matter — sometimes possibly related, but not the same as the above.

As human beings we’ll develop personas to socially present to others. To survive. To cope. To succeed. To please. To avoid sticking out or be targeted negatively. If nothing else, to manage our energy. And in being able to construct such personas, we may start incorporating traits and qualities we’d like to have and/or think others value. Those are the personas that spiritually we may refer to as “false”, as they may start to deviate from our inner truth; and that spiritual awakening and the spiritual path may invite you to revise, and possibly discard.

But unlike these personas, aspects are different: they’re a natural occurrence that’s brought out by surrounding circumstances in an almost “mechanical” way, one you’d find difficult to avoid even if you wanted to.

In a spiritual/metaphysical sense, we can say our human reality to some extent relies on its capacity for external contexts bringing out or calling these different sides of ourselves.

The truth is that we’re all spiritual entities “made of” Abstract Consciousness, and having these versions or sides is natural to us — and this external reality acts as a tool that aids in exploring them, by facilitating bringing them to life. This is to say: the mechanisms by which these different versions of ourselves are called use the same fundamental properties by which Abstract Consciousness is divided in aspects in a metaphysical sense. Abstract Consciousness explores Itself by shifting onto different “versions” of itself, and this is something that this reality does by default so to speak.

It’s even possible for you to even feel stuck or experience distress due to these mechanics (with this involving both natural aspects and “false” or artificial personas). Let’s say, for one reason or another, you have to stay in a version of you that you can’t shift out of or undress for too long. You may find yourself in situations in life that create this, for example if you ever feel your success/survival depend on the image you created; if circumstances calling for the aspect are too demanding and/or last for too long; or if you feel you have to live up to the expectations from others without ever being able to detach from them. Further, sometimes karma and/or the spiritual path will also place in a healing space you won’t be able to escape at your will.

Another sort of example to illustrate. Take the situation when a celebrity can’t quite discard their public persona, either because they rely on it for work, or just due to being constantly in the spotlight and under scrutiny. Say a character actor or performer chooses to stay in-character all the time, and they do so to the extent they can’t quite shake that character even after filming has long ended.

The personas you inhabit may involve a degree of falsehood, which in the long term may lead you to feel untruthful and detached from yourself, due to having to inhabit them as a mask. But even if the version you’re inhabiting isn’t artificial and rather just a different side of you, you may still find yourself under distress if you’re unable to not be that side against your wishes.

At What Density e.g. 6D, 5D, Etc. Can Spiritual Entities Have Aspects?

All Abstract Consciousness on every level/Density can be divisible into aspects of itself.

Now we’re addressing not just the human reality, but all Abstract Consciousness, all spiritual entities, anywhere in Creation.

Much like the human being can exhibit slightly different sides depending on circumstances, but those sides are still “them”, in a metaphysical/spiritual level an aspect is just a part, side, or facet of a broader spiritual entity. And much like the human self can have multiple sides to them, a spiritual entity can have multiple aspects of, and “in”, itself.

Each aspect is not the broader entity as a whole, but rather just a part. Yet, at the same time and somewhat paradoxically, that aspect is its broader entity, who’s simply experiencing Creation “through the eyes” of one of their aspects. This is similar to saying the social version of you is still the same you, simply being the side that’s being embodied by you at that time, within the context requiring so.

Metaphysically, an aspect of E entity on D Density can generally and simplistically be considered of the Density below E, in other words, D-1 – in potential while they’re part of the parent entity, and in an actualized sense once they’re exploring Creation independently, on their own.

This has to do with the mechanisms by which Consciousness is in perpetual expansion and subdivision, as well as with the metaphysical refraction of Light involved in the arising of the Densities themselves – the latter akin to the “rainbow” resulting from the refraction of the Source’s Light.

Every time you contemplate a sub-element or portion of Abstract Consciousness — i.e. an aspect — that portion is or results from the metaphysical process of refracting the Light of that Consciousness. The term refraction is used as this process is, on a metaphysical level, akin to white light passing through a prism causing its refraction, by which the “sub-parts” of that light — the colors of the rainbow — are separated and revealed.

Using this example, Yellow, Red, Blue, Purple, and so on are, were always, and always be, part of White; it’s just that ascertaining their existence involved a refraction of White that created a momentary separation of its constituent components, revealing them.

Metaphysically, when you ascertain the sub-components or aspects of a spiritual entity at a certain Density, those aspects are “created” (or, rather, were always there but are now discernible, made distinct) out of the metaphysical refraction the Light of that entity, the same refraction by which Densities arise. Thus, the vibration of those aspects can generally be observed as being of the Density “below” that of the parent entity i.e. D-1.

An aspect of an entity can either be integrated, or “immersed” if you will, in the Light of the parent entity they’re a part of; or they can be projected onto their corresponding (lower) Density where they can explore it as a sovereign entity themselves. This “projection” is achieved, again, by the refraction of parent entity’s Light, meaning, passing said Light through the “prism-like” effect of the division in-between the Densities, causing the aspect to shine as a distinct entity in that Density below.

This is similar to say the parent entity willingly placed themselves in a certain situation/context that “called” for that particular aspect to come forth, and that they are now embodying.

So we can have a 7D “broad/group entity” i.e. Monad which is divided into multiple 6D aspects; a 5D entity who can have multiple 4D aspects; and so on. The same way, human beings in 3D have various different “versions” or aspects to themselves; although I’d be less comfortable considering the latter to be “2D”, as they’re subsets of human awareness, still as if immersed in your its Light; but by which these mechanics can still nevertheless be observed.

These matters could be assessed further to an infinite degree and complexity.

For instance, a 6D entity can have several 5D aspects, then each of those 5D aspects can have its own 4D aspects, and so on, in essence creating within the broader entity a sort of “family tree” of its various aspects and the subdivisions it holds.

Additionally, for simplicity we’ve been using the example of a projection of a spiritual entity from a Density D onto a lower D-1 one; but being an aspect carries over across subsequent divisions/projections. Which is to say, an aspect/entity in 4D can see themselves as as aspect of their parent 5D entity above them, but also, by inheritance as aspect of the 6D entity above the 5D one. With all of these being part of the same Light that is projected or refracted across the spectrum of Densities.

Ultimately speaking, all Consciousness can be regarded as subdivisions as the multitude of aspects of Source/God/Creator Themselves, Which/Who bear the exact same properties, and to Where all entities will ultimately reconnect, and identify as Being One with.

What Are Aspects “For”? How Do They “Function”?

Let’s say you’re an entity of a certain Density. For example, a 6D entity.

Let’s say you wish to explore a lower Density, such as 5D. Or, you wish to explore and fledge out your knowledge of a particular aspect of yourself. Let’s say you wish to embody that aspect fully and experience Creation through their eyes.

What entities do in such case, first and while still in their “native” Density, is shifting their focus from their broader perception as an entity, “down” (or, in a more focused manner) to the perspective of the particular aspect, as if momentarily seeing reality through the aspect’s “eyes”.

This is not unlike momentarily experience being your professional self, or your social self, or your romantic partner self. As stated these are versions of you that aren’t all of you, but that “arise” momentarily to meet certain circumstances. All the spiritual entity made of Abstract Consciousness is doing here, is simply shifting its focus or perspective to the specific one of that particular aspect, if that makes sense.

Now, doing this while on your Density of origin, in this case 6D, means you’re still the same broad entity. You haven’t really ceased to be the original entity, you’re simply “shifting around” your perspective within your own consciousness to focus on your aspects’ without any way “isolating” them. This would be akin to recalling or pretending being your professional, social, etc. aspect, but only in your own mind, without the circumstances calling for them. As an exercise, it can only wield limited results.

In order to really focus on an aspect and experience fully, you have to surround yourself with circumstances that are able to call for, and thus isolate, just that aspect. And how do you do that?

This is where the entity can shine its Light to have it pass through the prism-like effect of the barrier between its Density and the Density below. In the process, this enforces a distinction or separation of its constituent part, which is otherwise integrated within.

Upon crossing that barrier, the Light of the entity that reaches the lower Density is now, not of the full entity, but just of the aspect, which is now separated and made distinct from the remainder energy of the broader entity, existing as its own entity.

The parent entity can technically still shift its focus back and forth between their perspective and that of D-1 aspect; from that perspective and in an absolute sense nothing has changed. But it happens the aspect, by virtue of this projection, is now for all effects and purposes to an extent isolated and insulated from the rest of the entity’s energy. They are now inhabiting a setting on their own, and surrounded by the Density D-1.

So it’s like they’re surrounded by circumstances that perpetually “call for” their energy only, simply by virtue of being on D-1. This is why we can say that an entity’s aspect is “of” a lower Density than that of the parent entity.

In this way, the entity has arranged for circumstances where the aspect can exist more consistently on its own, in a setting to which they are adjusted, as it is suitable and resonant with their own vibration. In other words: they are surrounded by an external setting that continually brings forth their energy, or mirrors their vibration if you will.

Note that despite these descriptions, the aspect still remains one with the entity; they’re still the entity’s original Light. But in a practical sense they’re no longer merely a though or experience in theory; instead, they’re now surrounded by an external set of circumstances that continually reinforces their particular perception.

That set of circumstances (or the vibration of the lower Density) will serve as catalyst for experiences that are more suitable and centered on them — as opposed to the vibration of the Density above, that would keep “calling” not just that aspect but all the other parts of the entity as a whole. It’s like saying that in the lower Density the aspect’s existence is being acknowledged non-stop.

So by this projection the aspect and is now free to begin their own path of experience, bearing the same individual Free Will that the parent entity also has — because they really are the parent entity, “in disguise” in a manner of speaking. Or to put it in a different way: this is the broader entity who now has the opportunity to experience Creation through the aspect’s eyes, in a more consistent or solidified manner if you will.

Using the same analogy of white light passing through a prism, if the white light was an entity projecting onto a lower Density, you’d have, say, the “red color” exploring that lower Density, doing so as an independent, sovereign entity. The original light is witnessing Creation while “playing the part” of red, one of its aspects.

Another analogy would be if you as a human being dived into a reality that could only resonate with, say, the professional version of yours, without ever bringing up any others. With the result of you embodying your your “professional self” non-stop.

One strong motivator for this way of exploring of Creation, is that spiritual entities cannot explore Densities below theirs as their “full” selves.

In the example used before, if our 6D entity wants to witness/explore the fifth Density, it cannot do so as its original 6D self. This is because, in very succinct terms, their full, original awareness and sense of identity won’t easily fit the lower Densities.

Well, they technically could; and the entity could try to do so – for a moment. For example, this is where on specific occasions certain beings from different realms can momentarily lower their vibration to manifest in ours, seemingly appearing or disappearing “out of nowhere”.

However, every Density in Creation corresponds to an average level of awareness (they are defined by it). And as Densities in their spectrum stand further away from the vibration to the Light of Source, they represent a higher and higher distortion and contraction in awareness relative to that Light of Source. Thus, a Density below is always a contraction and subdivision in vibration and awareness relative to the one above.

So while technically everything is possible in Creation, in practice if an entity of Density D wanted to transpose their full awareness directly onto D-1, they’d be subjected to a contraction that would over time incur in a severe risk of loss of awareness.

If our 6D entity would try to plunge and, so to speak, squeeze their full awareness to a Density below (and try to do so beyond what could be considered momentary) soon their awareness would start to contract and distort gravely. As their vibration was forced to adjust to the vibration of the lower Density, in the long run they’d risk the critical fracture of, let’s call it, their “structural integrity”.

The result would be the totality of the entity’s consciousness fracturing i.e. metaphysically breaking apart and disperse, likely as some form of division of their constituent parts, or aspects.

So what spiritual entities do all across the Cosmos to explore Creation beyond their natural Density of origin, is to project to said Densities as each of their various aspects. Namely, the aspects within them a) holding the desire to explore Creation, and b) matching the aspect’s Density in question. This is why in our example the 6D entity needed to project one of its 5D aspects onto the Fifth Density; that aspect would then be able to “handle” that Density, and be free to explore it, as their awareness would be able to comfortably match its vibration.

Which takes us to the next point: the inherent risks that come from such forms of projection.

Inherent Risks

The awareness of the aspect is now more grounded in a Density reflecting their own nature in a more persistent basis. This is where a level of risk is incurred: of the entity potentially losing track of the fact they’re projected from the Density(ies) above. This may happen for various reasons, throughout the course of the aspect’s journey.

The aspect is technically free to conduct their exploration and make their choices in a completely independent manner. Simplistically, while they and the parent entity are one and the same, due to a metaphysical “sleight of hand” they can also be regarded as separate and distinct, even if intimately and inexorably connected, entities.

Here’s an explanation for that sleight of hand:

The entity is infinite — and so are its points of view. The parent entity retains its original awareness, but at the same time they’re also playing the part of the aspect living on the Density they projected to. This enables the broader entity to at all times retain the two levels of awareness simultaneously and while the projection occurs – which remains true even if the aspect’s awareness forgets their spiritual origination. So the parent entity has the ability to continue to be and exist, simultaneously with their own aspect carrying out their exploration and experience. Further, both can be addressed either as the exact same entity, and also separately, as two entirely distinct entities. It’s for this exact same reason you can regard your own Soul/Higher Self as a separate figure “up above”whom you are ultimately an aspect of, but also as being yourself — whatever is most convenient and resonates at any given time.

So. The parent entity retains their own essence and Free Will at all times; but also so does the aspect. And the aspect can, “should”, be regarded also as an entirely independent and sovereign entity in their own right. Because fundamentally that’s what they are.

And this new spiritual entity – an aspect who’s a subset of a broader entity, while still being that same entity “in disguise” — may even be motivated to place some distance between themselves and the reality above from which they come from. Why? So they may abstract from it. So they may have their own journey. So they may act based on their own agency, and not something above them that isn’t “just them”.

The projection will have occurred out of an interest held by the entity in exploring Creation, their interest in experiences, and/or in fledging out their self-understanding. So when the sense of “finally being themselves” arrives, it can be pervaded with a newfound joy and sense of freedom. That joy may very well motivate the aspect to act on their own accord, pulling away from any guidance/references from the broader entity above, their original nature.

So while at least initially the aspect may very well be aware of their own origination, they now are in a different Density, in a different reality, and with a different awareness. So over time, coupled with their enthusiasm for the experience, as their journey continues they may or may not gradually lose track of their original spiritual context, depending on the choices they make and what they go through.

In this we must additionally factor the possibility of going through their own suffering and traumas as they explore and delve into duality more deeply. The pain/shock of such experiences can spiritually affect their ability to recall their origin, or at least cause them to lose trust in it, doubt their intentions, question its nature, and so on. The experience of suffering can traditionally and easily introduce an additional vector of strain in the aspect’s disposition towards their parent entity and spiritual origination.

During any and all of it, they’re still the original spiritual entity focused on experiencing itself as their aspect. But with the continuation, they may drop in consciousness, and do so to the point of losing track of their original perspectives entirely. A critical point of failure might be reached at some point, where the aspect will lose the ability entirely to allow the perspective of the parent entity’s perspective to move “back and forth” between the levels of their consciousness and reach the aspect — at which point we’ll say they’re “permanently” severed from the parent entity.

With this they metaphysically lose the freedom to return to their original, pre-projection state — which is none other than their awareness as the parent entity. Not because they’ve been trapped by an external force, but primarily due to losing the conscious connection to their own truth, ultimately as a consequence of the continued application of their Free Will. Or you could say the broader entity’s perspective became “locked” into that of the aspect, if you will.

The word “permanently” is used, not in the sense of being irreversible but in that it does enforce the subsequent need for the aspect to work spiritually. Until they can re-expand their awareness, and be able to once again “rejoin” (or attain the perspective of) themselves as the original higher entity, at which point the aspect is ready to spiritually ascend. Leading them to rejoin the parent entity in their original Density, or at least to once more allow their consciousness to freely move back and forth between theirs and the Density above.

Note that ascension isn’t a dissolution/loss. The aspect will under no circumstances lose their identity to the broader entity. None of what they gained in terms of experience is lost — which would be nonsensical, given expansion of consciousness was the whole point of the journey to begin with.

In other words: you don’t “dissolve” in any way, shape, or form when you connect with the above reams or spiritually ascend. With spiritual progress there is never, ever, with no exceptions, any type of loss of consciousness; there is only expansion of the self’s awareness and their perception of who they are, and who they were all along.

At most what happens is that the aspect recalls who they really are, and were all along. Meaning, their sense of identity, and their awareness in general, simply expands to encompass more than what they did before.

How Many Aspects Are Permitted per Entity?

The aspects each entity has are not so much a function of how many are allowed, or even “how many exist”. The answer to both would ultimately equate to an infinite amount, as consciousness is unlimited and fractal, infinite and infinitely expanding.

Rather, how many aspects an entity has at a given point in time (or rather, its state of self-understanding) corresponds more to how many aspects it has been able to realize, acknowledge, ascertain, explore, and develop. Which might in turn will have been achieved by the spiritual work conducted in this regard, by the entity and its aspects.

Therefore, the matter of how many aspects ends up being a function of the entity’s spiritual advancement. As a general rule of thumb, an entity has more aspects and/or is able to handle more projections, the more spiritual advancement it has achieved — the more it knows itself, as it were. Or you could say that spiritual development is what permits an entity to realize and experience their own aspects.

Note spiritual advancement doesn’t necessarily have to do with the Density you’re in/of. You can have, say, a 6D entity who’s very new this Universe; in this scenario the advancement of this entity and the understanding it holds about itself will be sparse, vague, underdeveloped, despite being in/of such a high Density; compared to an entity also in 6D but with a higher level of experience in projecting onto the lower Densities, and/or that has evolved or “climbed” their way from lower Densities to the sixth.

Are Aspects Based on the Identity/Traits/Essence of the Entity? Is There a Hierarchy Amongst the Aspects e.g. Children in A Family?

The spiritual essence of each aspect is part of the spiritual essence of the parent entity. Their essence can, loosely speaking, be said to “derive” from the parent entity’s essence, much like your student side, your friend side, your sibling side, etc., are all intrinsically related to, yet different variations or subsets of, who you are.

Although an aspect is part of the same beingness, each aspect’s identity is very distinct, immutable, and non-interchangeable amongst each other within the parent entity. This can be seen in the relative difficulty in mixing different aspects, or in attempting to bring them forth in mismatched external circumstances. In that regard an entity’s aspects can be, to an extent, like water and oil: their essences are distinct enough that they do not meld together.

This essentially reflects how they “actually exist” i.e. hold their own unique essence, rather than simply being transient motions or illusions — much like the parent entity themselves.

The essence of an entity as well as that of their aspects fundamentally doesn’t change; but it can be explored, learned, and understood to ever increasing amounts, up to an infinite degree. That I am aware, an aspect’s essence isn’t chosen in any way; rather, it’s a persistent and emergent property. In the sense an aspect’s (spiritual, core) essence, much like the essence parent entity’s of which it is a part of, reveals itself in the constant fractal dynamic in Creation. They “flare up” spontaneously, a process assisted by undergoing experience; and once the parent entity realizes their presence, they may at some point choose to explore it. Yet, paradoxically, that same essence has always existed.

Even for the aspects of an entity on the same “level” — all 5D aspects of an entity, for example — the entity can nevertheless hold aspects at different degrees of advancement and experience. The same way you have Source Itself being comprised of a myriad of entities all in various different levels of advancement, even for those exploring the same Density.

Can Aspects Communicate With Their Parent Entity?

The answer is they can always do so, yet, the capacity with which they might be able to hinges on several factors, all of which boiling down to the degree to which they’ve approached the realization they’re part of something greater, and how far they are in the process.

In any case, through their spiritual evolution the aspect will eventually realize their parent entity’s existence, that they had always been there, and that they were always reachable. The only impediments to connecting and reaching out to it had to do with the aspect’s spiritual awareness and willingness.

As a general assessment, an aspect can reach their parent entity:

• internally i.e. through the heart and one’s own spiritual development. This generally equates to “becoming” the entity, and being open to the spontaneous moments of resonance with their original thresholds of insight/perception. Such instances may take the form of insights and clarity, “ah ah” moments, spiritual downloads, personal breakthroughs, and so on; as well as
• externally, addressing the higher as if an external entity. Both perspectives are valid at the same time, b) generally involving methods of contacting with any entity spiritually, including receiving intuitive thought, channeling, meditation, prayer, and so on.

Therefore, a good portion of this answer will fall in the category of learning how to receive intuitive insight, how to tap into spiritual guidance, and otherwise learning how to recognize spiritual and metaphysical input. In any case, the process of establishing communication with an entity whose essence is intimately known to the self will likely involve a unique and personal combination of the two elements above.

With the topic of communicating with a spiritual entity, in particular one who’s the parent entity or “Higher Self” to the individual, oftentimes by the time the seeker asks the question that communication is either already reachable if not already occurring without them realizing so. In which case the challenge/premise might be not so much discerning whether it is possible, but perhaps more realizing how it is and/or how it’s already taking place.

Can Aspects of the Same Spiritual Entity Communicate With Each Other?

Within the scope of the broader entity, and in a purely abstract metaphysical/spiritual setting, aspects can acknowledge and engage each other. This will be pervaded by the broader entity’s ability of being able to “shift around” their point of focus amongst the various aspects and back to the entity as a whole, in a simultaneous fashion. While it might sound “weird” this derives from the entity’s capacity in perceiving itself as the whole while also witnessing each aspect as their own entity.

Related to when entities project as aspects, my knowledge in that regard is sparse as that hasn’t been a predominant topic in readings. I speculate that as an entity projects an aspect onto a certain reality, they might retain the ability to shift in awareness between themselves and that of the aspect, therefore still allowing aspects to acknowledge each other. But because the priority in that scenario tends to shift to become more about the experience of the aspect; and the more the aspect’s awareness might shift to a more individualistic tone for their experience; the influence or even existence of other aspects might tend to become more negligible for them, with the main spiritual relationship that matters for the aspect being more the 1-to-1 connection they retain and formulate with their parent entity (or the Higher Self, or God, or the Creator, etc).

In addition, there’s the particular case of an entity having aspects not just spiritually projected but also physically incarnating in a certain material setting (the former implying the latter). All indications I have in this regard, is that when there are multiple aspects incarnating/reincarnating in the same reality, they generally cannot meet at all. Doing so, for reasons that I’m not privy to, appears to risk a critical dissolution of the incarnating experience. Perhaps there might be metaphysical consequences to the incarnating aspect witnessing its present in another before they’re spiritually ready to process so.

Therefore, and that I am aware at this time, multiple aspect of the same entity who are present on the same planetary sphere, cannot communicate or meet with each other – save perhaps indirectly, in a spiritual/energetic sense. For instance, those aspects might inadvertently exchange energy and spiritual information in a non-conscious way, given how they are, still, ultimately the same entity.

What Happens if an Aspect Gets Trapped Due To Karma?

This equates to the situation of an aspect having accrued loss of awareness through their choices, namely involving the accumulation of karma, leading them to become bound to reincarnate in the setting where that karma was created. So this fits in the criteria addressed in the “Inherent Risks” section, that of the aspect being unable to reconnect, or recall being one with, the parent entity.

All incarnating human beings on Earth are aspects of an higher entity/Higher Self. With the vast majority of them, save perhaps for those who have spiritually graduated and/or opened the possibility otherwise, have been trapped in the reincarnation cycle due to accumulated karmic attributes.

What happens, is what always happens: the entity loses track of who they are, and spiritually are in a context of lowered awareness. And their long-term spiritual task is to conduct their own spiritual journey, until their spiritual progress leads them, in consciousness, back Home.