Akashic Records Reading [Quick]: The Dreamer and the Tested
Start of Reading
Audrey [not the person’s real name] is a 4th Density (4D) spiritual entity, who additionally also has a distant past and spiritual background on the 6th Density (6D).
We could say that “up” on the 6th Density there’s a version of Audrey who is the equivalent of her soul or Higher Self if you will. if you will. This 6D Higher Self then spiritually spiritually projects a portion of themselves onto the lower Densities closer to physical experience, in this case, namely, the 4th Density.
Then the entity on 4D who results from this projection is the one who is able to participate in 3D reincarnation cycles such as the one on Earth. As with all metaphysical aspects, the 4D entity or “version” is the same being as the 6D one, simply experiencing Creation through their own Fourth-Density perspective.
Because of how linear time (a construct related to the material planes) is experienced from the point of view of the 4D entity, we would consider that the latest and most relatable perspective for Audrey (spiritually speaking) would that of the 4th Density version of herself.
Whereas the 6D version of herself and their framework of existence might spiritually register as something more distant; something that is “far” and/or that goes way back in the past. And it’s therefore felt as something not very present, or meaningful for that matter.
This is a valid assessment in the sense that from the 4D entity’s perspective their soul or Higher Self had projected onto the 4th Density “a long time ago”; and since that moment many experiences and memories have been accrued since.
Note, again, that despite these different versions standing on different levels of awareness, they nevertheless are and represent different sides of the same being — her.
The 6D entity/Soul represents a very high, very subtle form of awareness, here with some polarization towards Feminine Energy (F-E) and F-E qualities. The 6th Density in general, a high plane of existence comprised mostly of the abstract and immaterial — thoughts, energy, consciousness itself, etc. — is already of some polarization towards F-E, with this particular 6D entity’s essence in alignment with this.
Within that context, we’ll describe Audrey’s immaterial 6D awareness. What first comes across is that this energy bears values that are… fantasy-like.
Of dream and potential. Of idealization.
It’s a type of energy not unlike the one that often exists at the start of journeys and projects; when an idea first appears and the mind hasn’t built safeguards yet. It represents pure child-like curiosity; an intense anticipation for what’s ahead; a pure sense of excitement for what can or could be. It will gleefully imagine and fantasize without restraint, without limitation, unlimited by observation of practicality.
It is an energy that’s highly soft, subtle, and free. It is capable of dreaming and manifesting ideas and thoughts into existence, while also being somewhat innocent and naive, like the nature of a child.
Purely for the sake of coalescing the ideas we’re offering, we’d suggest the color or tone matching this energy as that of a very bright and soft, “girly” pink. And we’d say this would be a very whimsical and bubbly energy; very much an energy of fairy tales, unicorns and rainbows, colloquially speaking.
It is an awareness that dreams in idealization and theory i.e. how things should be if the self was in full control over them. If a human being embodied this type of consciousness, others could describe them as being bright and full of energy, but perhaps somewhat idealistic, and lacking in the practical experience of having gone through challenges in life.
This is how the reading aimed to succinctly describe the tone, the energy, of 6D Audrey.
The awareness on the 4D aspect, in turn, and within the context of this explanation, is in some ways the opposite of this.
The Fourth Density in general, while more closely related to experience in the physical realities, is nonetheless similarly polarized towards F-E like the 6th. It is a Density of connection, belonging, empathy, sensitivity, heart’s love, and mutually chosen harmony.
Even so, it happens that Audrey, as a 4D entity and in that capacity sharing these baseline traits to some extent, is nevertheless very much a battle-hardened being, in a manner of speaking.
Many things were lived by the 4D aspect ever since they projected onto the material planes for experience. On this spiritual journey throughout the material planes— here abstracting all of the experience of the entity which may involve multiple planetary cycles — there were many ups and downs, many successes and failures, all of which learned from as expected.
Throughout that journey of experience, expectations were adjusted and re-adjusted; corrections and experiments were tried and trialed, until a few were found to be effective while discarding the rest. Until the self, on a spiritual level and generally speaking, reached a point where they felt they had things, for the most part, figured out. We are speaking in broad terms of the progress and maturation of the spiritual entity: they reached a point where for the most part they felt they had gotten a handle on experiencing the material planes, and handling themselves while doing so.
This didn’t mean bad or unwanted things wouldn’t be experienced again; it didn’t mean easy solutions or outs for problems would always be around the corner. But it meant the self now felt prepared and wise enough to tackle such situations. The self felt, and feels, experienced enough to mostly stand in a place of “I’ve got this” when navigating it.
The result was as a 4D entity Audrey is an extremely practical, experienced, and grounded consciousness. This somewhat contrasts with the more imaginative and idealistic 6D awareness that is also hers. It’s not that these energies are incompatible, nevertheless the reading juxtaposes these two sides to the consciousness of the soul, the 6D one more abstract and whimsical, and the 4D one much more hardened by practical experience in the trials of the physical plane. The latter is just as part of Audrey as a soul as the former.
The more hardened 4D side could translate to her conscious awareness in the present moment, for instance, with her coming across as a naturally mature, experienced, self-assured, and/or wise person. Alternatively, this could be something subtle and/or sporadic that manifests only at certain moments, when a more experienced and hardy side to the self is called upon. Nevertheless, to whichever extent this part of Audrey might translate to her current reality, this part of her would transmit a great deal of calmness, assuredness, and above all, safety.
This could be a sense of safety that is spiritual and intrinsic. It would be less about specific external circumstances that would allow or justify it, and more something that just… exists within, in Audrey and/or in her presence. You could perhaps say it’s in her “vibe” or aura.
This sense of confidence is intrinsic to Audrey’s spiritual energy, and arises from the spiritual self largely feeling mature, ready, able, self-sufficient, and empowered to tackle whatever comes their way. It’s a calm form of confidence when it comes to dealing with the outside (physical) world, and with any possible things that might be unexpected, unpleasant, unwanted, etc.
It’s possible for Audrey to not even realize this side to her is there. Nevertheless it may be seen when things in life feel relatively simple to handle; when issues take a limited amount of energy from the self; when having a no-fuss way of handling matters in day-to-day life. This energy would likely very uncomplicated, very succinct, again, very self-sufficient.
It could also be seen in the feeling I already have most of I need; and if I’m missing something — an answer, a solution, an outlet, a tool, and/or a missing piece of the puzzle — I’ll manage. I might have to ask, look around, explore, ask for help, and/or take matters into my own hands. But whichever the case, sooner or later, what I need will be just around the corner.
So this would be a description of how Audrey’s 4D energy/awareness and its “vibe” would feel like, and may be identified.
As mentioned, you may have noticed a contrast between the two energies. Even if both are part of the totality of the spiritual consciousness, co-existing at different levels of existence (or at different points in time, or of the spiritual journey, depending on perspective).
One of them, the 6D one, is very high in vibration and is subtle and soft, almost delicate, in essence. It’s very primordial, or very early if you will, relative to the stages of the overall spiritual journey. It carries a strong element of innocence and naivety, and in its nature bears a limited integration of what we’d call “practical experience”.
The other, the 4D one, is a perfectly fitting cog in a wheel, so to speak. It is adjusted, works, and makes things tick. A rudder and compass to steer the waters of destiny as these are boldly traveled. Necessarily not in the same threshold of awareness of the first, this energy is nonetheless practical, hardened, and very wise in its own way, carrying strong elements of security and confidence.
In observing the contrast between the two that is brought forth by the reading, I would extrapolate said contrast may have been reflected at points throughout Audrey’s life.
A possibility for example would have been for Audrey as a child to have embodied more the naive nature of her soft 6D feminine self, embodying fantasy, daydreaming, playfulness, and over time, as she matured and entered adulthood, she might have changed towards adopting seemingly more pragmatic traits, becoming more self-assured, hardened. In which case she would have stepped more into the more M-E 4D nature of the self, more secure and “knows what they’re doing”. The term Masculine Energy or M-E is used here with a degree of purposefulness, referring (in Earth’s human-level consciousness) to the approach that handles or reacts to things in a succinct, pragmatic, “no-fuss” manner.
Another possibility would be the scenario where the same innocent/dreamy child would be dismissed, judged, or attacked by parent/tutor figures embodying a much more practical, pragmatic (and possibly un-empathetic) energy. The latter representing the elements of practical nous and hardening to life, and that of knowing “how things work” — but perhaps also, again, having learned so at the cost of some disillusionment, loss of empathy, compassion, caring, etc.
Given the nature of the two layers of the self, it could have also been the other way around, for example the dependent growing being the one who was more pragmatic-minded and/or having to endure hardship early while growing up, and with external adult authorities and figureheads representing an energy that was less resourceful, more unprepared, more aloof in their responsibilities, softer in terms of establishing boundaries, and so on.
The contrast above, perhaps lived through through the types of situations mentioned or others similar in tone, might have given rise to a certain disparity or inner doubt regarding these two elements: innocence and practicality.
Certain inner/core questions could have arisen within along the lines of: Is the truth of a certain matter in the idealization/innocence or in the pragmatic, “real-life” nous? Who’s more right, the hopeful but innocent idealist, or the adult holding power/money/influence/etc? Is “right” something that’s determined by power, or an intrinsic value in and of itself regardless of anything else? Perhaps this could apply in a less philosophical manner to more mundane choices, such as when a child is to be pampered or rewarded as opposed to boundaries being taught, or giving “tough love” for example.
Perhaps this could apply in a less philosophical manner to more mundane choices, such as when a child is to be pampered or rewarded as opposed to boundaries being taught, or giving “tough love” for example.
Such lines of personal experience and questioning, deep down, would account for a certain dichotomy between the differences of the two layers of the same soul: the 6D higher spiritual self, and the more experienced and hardened 4D aspect. Perhaps also, to some extent, it may reflect how the latter would see and relates to the former who for all effects and purposes represents to them or Higher Self — and ultimately, consequently, due to these archetypes being related, to the figure of Source/God in general.
To the extent such a contrast was experienced to any capacity with parents or tutors, these situations and relationships would have enabled the self to bring forth and explore these inner questions in a more, if you will, direct manner — emotional and experimentally — rather than in a purely theoretical and abstract doubting without too much purchase in the real world.
Ultimately, the two elements are not disparate and distinct. Rather, they are two “versions” of the same beingness, two aspects within the same soul with slight variations of awareness, circumstance, and stages of spiritual development.
Thus, rather than being seen as different and separate, or even opposing, in reality they’re two parts in the same totality. They aren’t one against the other, and neither are “wrong” nor “right”: they are simply two different stages of understanding in a continuum of experience. This is the essential principle by which any related questions may be approached.
The original “child” — abstract consciousness — joyous yet naive, projected to the material worlds to gather practical experience and wisdom, becoming an “experienced adult” safe in their ways through learning and experience.
However, later down the line even that adult will eventually wish to return Home. Which is to say, the spiritual entity will want to leave the realms of hardship and discard the hardening that does not reflect their core truth. And they’ll want to return back to the original pure state of abstract consciousness. They’ll bring with them the practical nous: in the form of safety, confidence, and assurance, that were spiritually acquired and fought for, and legitimately integrated within. But they’ll also want to enable to child to dream and hope and think in terms of fantasy and imagination once more, without limiting or preventing them from doing so. For that is their sacred core self as well, from where all began, and to where everything will eventually lead to.
They are not opposites: one is simply the natural progression of the other. Every learner started their journey as the dreamer, and said dreamer was never truly lost. They still reside within, no matter that which was learned — or its cost.
The innocence of the girl — 6D consciousness — remains just as pure and steadfast as it was at the very beginning. And it was this girl who desired on her own volition to go forth and explore practical matters; which she chose to, and did. In turn, the practical nous of the battle-hardened veteran still bears the original innocence of the little girl within. And can, and should, and is meant to, shield that original innocence, with all of the confidence and perseverance that are now theirs as well.